1973 Ericson 27 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

1973 Ericson 271973 Ericson 27
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1973 Ericson 271982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerEricsonPacific Seacraft
Year1973–19801982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL6.55 m (21.5 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.8 m² (332 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1973 Ericson 27
17.02
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1973 Ericson 27
41.80
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1973 Ericson 27
0.81
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1973 Ericson 27
20.13
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1973 Ericson 27 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1973 Ericson 27 is a 1970s design by Ericson from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1973 Ericson 27 was penned by Bruce King. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1973 Ericson 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1973 Ericson 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.02 and 30.8 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1973 Ericson 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1973 Ericson 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1973 Ericson 27 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1973 Ericson 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ericson 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ericson 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1973 Ericson 27 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27