1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
VS
1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Pacific Seacraft 271978 Sabre 30
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftSabre
Year1982–20051978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL6.55 m (21.5 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.64 m (8.7 ft)2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.14 m (3.7 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.5 m² (328 ft²)37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was penned by William Crealock. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.64m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The 1978 Sabre 30 is 0.91m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1978 Sabre 30 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 Sabre 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Sabre 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Sabre 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 · 1978 Sabre 30