Hanse 320 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1978 Sabre 30 1978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1978 Sabre 30
General
Manufacturer Hanse Sabre
Year 2005–2010 1978–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.78m longer than the 1978 Sabre 30. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Sabre 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS