Hanse 320 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
Hanse 400 Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 Hanse 400
General
Manufacturer Hanse Hanse
Year 2005–2010 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Germany
Designer judel/vrolijk & co judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.18m longer than the Hanse 320. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS