Hanse 400 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison
Hanse 400
1984 Ericson 38
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 400 | 1984 Ericson 38 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Ericson |
| Year | 2002–2006 | 1984–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Bruce King / Ron Holland |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.60 m (34.8 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) | 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 29 HP | 30 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 280 L (74.0 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 400 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.
In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.52m longer than the 1984 Ericson 38. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.