2005 Najad 460 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

2005 Najad 460 2005 Najad 460
VS
1984 Ericson 38 1984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2005 Najad 460 1984 Ericson 38
General
Manufacturer Najad Ericson
Year 2005–2013 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Bruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA 14.10 m (46.3 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 11.80 m (38.7 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 4.20 m (13.8 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 2.15 m (7.1 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 13,500 kg (29,762 lbs) 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 97.0 m² (1,044 ft²) 60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 100 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 320 L (84.5 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 560 L (147.9 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Najad 460
17.38
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Najad 460
38.52
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Najad 460
0.71
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Najad 460
19.66
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Najad 460 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Najad 460 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2005 Najad 460 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 2005 Najad 460 measures 14.10m (46.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 2005 Najad 460 is 2.52m longer than the 1984 Ericson 38. The 2005 Najad 460 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Najad 460 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 97.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Najad 460 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Najad 460 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2005 Najad 460 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Najad 460 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 560L of water capacity and 320L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Najad 460 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS