2004 Oyster 46 vs 2005 Najad 460 — Comparison
2004 Oyster 46
2005 Najad 460
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2004 Oyster 46 | 2005 Najad 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Oyster | Najad |
| Year | 2004–2010 | 2005–2013 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | United Kingdom | Sweden |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 14.02 m (46.0 ft) | 14.10 m (46.3 ft) |
| LWL | 11.60 m (38.1 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| Beam | 4.20 m (13.8 ft) | 4.20 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 2.05 m (6.7 ft) | 2.15 m (7.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) | 13,500 kg (29,762 lbs) |
| Ballast | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) | 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 90.0 m² (969 ft²) | 97.0 m² (1,044 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 75 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 250 L (66.0 gal) | 320 L (84.5 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 450 L (118.9 gal) | 560 L (147.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2004 Oyster 46 and 2005 Najad 460 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Oyster 46 is a 2000s design by Oyster from United Kingdom, while the 2005 Najad 460 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 2004 Oyster 46 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 2005 Najad 460 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 2004 Oyster 46 measures 14.02m (46.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2005 Najad 460 at 14.10m (46.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The 2005 Najad 460 is 0.08m longer than the 2004 Oyster 46. The 2005 Najad 460 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2004 Oyster 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.97 and 90.0 m² of sail area. The 2005 Najad 460, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 97.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 Najad 460 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2004 Oyster 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2005 Najad 460 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.4% for the 2004 Oyster 46 and 38.5% for the 2005 Najad 460, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2004 Oyster 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2005 Najad 460 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 560L water and 320L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2005 Najad 460 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2005 Najad 460 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.