Hanse 400 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

Hanse 400 Hanse 400
VS
1979 Pearson 37 1979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 400 1979 Pearson 37
General
Manufacturer Hanse Pearson
Year 2002–2006 1979–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 12.10 m (39.7 ft) 11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL 10.60 m (34.8 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam 3.80 m (12.5 ft) 3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft 1.95 m (6.4 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) 7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) 3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 68.0 m² (732 ft²) 56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 29 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 280 L (74.0 gal) 190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The Hanse 400 is 0.82m longer than the 1979 Pearson 37. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS