Hanse 400 vs 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F — Comparison

Hanse 400 Hanse 400
VS
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 400 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
General
Manufacturer Hanse Hallberg-Rassy
Year 2002–2006 1986–1995
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Sweden
Designer judel/vrolijk & co German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 12.10 m (39.7 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 10.60 m (34.8 ft) 10.20 m (33.5 ft)
Beam 3.80 m (12.5 ft) 3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft 1.95 m (6.4 ft) 2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 68.0 m² (732 ft²) 78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 29 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity 280 L (74.0 gal) 400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 7
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 400
17.87
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
16.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 400
30.92
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 400
0.77
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 400
16.16
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
21.84

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 400 and 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 400 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is a 1980s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hanse 400 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Hanse 400 measures 12.10m (39.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.80m, compared to the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is 0.70m longer than the Hanse 400. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, with an SA/D of 16.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has a comfort ratio of 21.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 400 and 40.0% for the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS