1973 Ericson 27 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1973 Ericson 271973 Ericson 27
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1973 Ericson 27Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerEricsonHunter
Year1973–19801998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL6.55 m (21.5 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.8 m² (332 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1973 Ericson 27
17.02
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1973 Ericson 27
41.80
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1973 Ericson 27
0.81
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1973 Ericson 27
20.13
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1973 Ericson 27 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1973 Ericson 27 is a 1970s design by Ericson from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1973 Ericson 27 was penned by Bruce King. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1973 Ericson 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The Hunter 280 is 0.30m longer than the 1973 Ericson 27. The Hunter 280 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1973 Ericson 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.02 and 30.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1973 Ericson 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1973 Ericson 27 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1973 Ericson 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ericson 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1973 Ericson 27 · Hunter 280