1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk IIHanse 342
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsHanse
Year1974–19792006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaGermany
DesignerCuthbertson & Cassianjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 0.37m longer than the Hanse 342. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · Hanse 342