1975 Columbia 34 Mk II vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1975 Columbia 34 Mk II 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II
VS
Hanse 342 Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II Hanse 342
General
Manufacturer Columbia Hanse
Year 1975–1980 2006–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer William Crealock judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.5 m² (501 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Columbia 34 Mk II
15.71
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Columbia 34 Mk II
41.74
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Columbia 34 Mk II
0.70
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Columbia 34 Mk II
23.07
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II is 0.06m longer than the Hanse 342. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.71 and 46.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Columbia 34 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS