1975 Pearson 39 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1975 Pearson 391975 Pearson 39
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 Pearson 391979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerPearsonWesterly
Year1975–19801979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerWilliam ShawEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.8 m² (654 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 2.14m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1975 Pearson 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 Pearson 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 Pearson 39 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar