1975 Pearson 39 vs 1994 Sabre 362 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 39 1975 Pearson 39
VS
1994 Sabre 362 1994 Sabre 362

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Pearson 39 1994 Sabre 362
General
Manufacturer Pearson Sabre
Year 1975–1980 1994–2001
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,540 kg (5,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.8 m² (654 ft²) 54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
1994 Sabre 362
18.79

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 1994 Sabre 362 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 1994 Sabre 362 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1994 Sabre 362 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 0.92m longer than the 1994 Sabre 362. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 1994 Sabre 362, with an SA/D of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Sabre 362 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1994 Sabre 362 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1994 Sabre 362 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Sabre 362 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS