1975 Pearson 39 vs Catalina 385 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 39 1975 Pearson 39
VS
Catalina 385 Catalina 385

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Pearson 39 Catalina 385
General
Manufacturer Pearson Catalina
Year 1975–1980 2006–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 11.73 m (38.5 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.21 m (33.5 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 2.06 m (6.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.8 m² (654 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 242 L (63.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
Catalina 385
16.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
Catalina 385
38.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
Catalina 385
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
Catalina 385
18.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and Catalina 385 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 385 is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 385 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Catalina 385 at 11.73m (38.5ft) with a 3.76m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 0.16m longer than the Catalina 385. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 385, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Catalina 385 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 38.9% for the Catalina 385, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Catalina 385 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS