1975 Pearson 39 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 391975 Pearson 39
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 Pearson 392010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
ManufacturerPearsonX-Yachts
Year1975–19802010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerWilliam ShawNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.8 m² (654 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 1.32m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 Pearson 39 · 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35