1975 S2 9.2C vs 1985 Sabre 32 — Comparison

1975 S2 9.2C 1975 S2 9.2C
VS
1985 Sabre 32 1985 Sabre 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 S2 9.2C 1985 Sabre 32
General
Manufacturer S2 Sabre
Year 1975–1982 1985–1991
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Arthur Edmunds Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.7 m² (460 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 S2 9.2C
16.99
1985 Sabre 32
16.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 S2 9.2C
41.11
1985 Sabre 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 S2 9.2C
0.76
1985 Sabre 32
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 S2 9.2C
21.78
1985 Sabre 32
18.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 S2 9.2C and 1985 Sabre 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 S2 9.2C is a 1970s design by S2 from USA, while the 1985 Sabre 32 is a 1980s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1975 S2 9.2C was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1985 Sabre 32 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1975 S2 9.2C measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1985 Sabre 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1985 Sabre 32 is 0.61m longer than the 1975 S2 9.2C.

Looking at performance, the 1975 S2 9.2C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 42.7 m² of sail area. The 1985 Sabre 32, with an SA/D of 16.71 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1975 S2 9.2C has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 S2 9.2C offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1985 Sabre 32 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1975 S2 9.2C and 40.0% for the 1985 Sabre 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 S2 9.2C provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1985 Sabre 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 S2 9.2C is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 S2 9.2C has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 S2 9.2C offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS