1975 S2 9.2C vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1975 S2 9.2C 1975 S2 9.2C
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar 1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 S2 9.2C 1979 Westerly Fulmar
General
Manufacturer S2 Westerly
Year 1975–1982 1979–1986
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Arthur Edmunds Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.7 m² (460 ft²) 36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 S2 9.2C
16.99
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 S2 9.2C
41.11
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 S2 9.2C
0.76
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 S2 9.2C
21.78
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 S2 9.2C and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 S2 9.2C is a 1970s design by S2 from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1975 S2 9.2C was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1975 S2 9.2C measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 0.61m longer than the 1975 S2 9.2C. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 S2 9.2C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 42.7 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1975 S2 9.2C has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 S2 9.2C offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1975 S2 9.2C and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 S2 9.2C provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 S2 9.2C has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS