1983 Sabre 28 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1983 Sabre 28 1983 Sabre 28
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar 1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1983 Sabre 28 1979 Westerly Fulmar
General
Manufacturer Sabre Westerly
Year 1983–1990 1979–1986
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Roger Hewson Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 35.3 m² (380 ft²) 36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 1.22m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS