1983 Sabre 28 vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 28 1983 Sabre 28
VS
Hanse 315 Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1983 Sabre 28 Hanse 315
General
Manufacturer Sabre Hanse
Year 1983–1990 2010–2016
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Roger Hewson judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 35.3 m² (380 ft²) 41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 4
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hanse 315 is 1.12m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The Hanse 315 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Sabre 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS