Hanse 315 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

Hanse 315 Hanse 315
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 315 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Hanse C&C Yachts
Year 2010–2016 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany Canada
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 9.65 m (31.7 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.55 m (28.1 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.15 m (10.3 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 41.5 m² (447 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 85 L (22.5 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 315
16.20
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 315
28.57
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 315
0.78
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 315
17.75
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 315 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.41m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS