1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Beneteau C&C Yachts
Year 1995–2001 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France Canada
Designer Groupe Finot Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 9.68 m (31.8 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.45 m (27.7 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.27 m (10.7 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,200 kg (9,259 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.5 m² (479 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.38m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS