1980 CS 33 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1980 CS 33 1980 CS 33
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 CS 33 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer CS Yachts C&C Yachts
Year 1980–1987 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada Canada
Designer Ray Wall Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.1 m² (529 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS