1981 Pearson 36 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 36 1981 Pearson 36
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Pearson 36 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Pearson C&C Yachts
Year 1981–1985 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Canada
Designer William Shaw Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.6 m² (555 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Pearson 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Pearson 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS