1981 Pearson 36 vs 1990 Island Packet 29 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 36 1981 Pearson 36
VS
1990 Island Packet 29 1990 Island Packet 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Pearson 36 1990 Island Packet 29
General
Manufacturer Pearson Island Packet
Year 1981–1985 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw Bob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.12 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.6 m² (555 ft²) 33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1990 Island Packet 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1990 Island Packet 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 1.83m longer than the 1990 Island Packet 29. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 59% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1990 Island Packet 29, with an SA/D of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1981 Pearson 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Island Packet 29 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Island Packet 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Pearson 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS