1981 Pearson 36 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 36 1981 Pearson 36
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Pearson 36 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
Manufacturer Pearson Beneteau
Year 1981–1985 2009–2013
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer William Shaw Finot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) 5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.6 m² (555 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 0.23m longer than the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS