1981 Pearson 36 vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 36 1981 Pearson 36
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1981 Pearson 36 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
Manufacturer Pearson Hallberg-Rassy
Year 1981–1985 1997–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer William Shaw German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.6 m² (555 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 36
15.66
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 36
40.74
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 36
0.77
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 36
20.04
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 36 and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 0.32m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS