Hunter 356 vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

Hunter 356 Hunter 356
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 356 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
Manufacturer Hunter Hallberg-Rassy
Year 2000–2005 1997–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Glenn Henderson German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 9.30 m (30.5 ft) 8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.53 m (11.6 ft) 3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 53.0 m² (571 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The Hunter 356 is 0.47m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS