1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
VS
Hunter 356 Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 Hunter 356
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Hunter
Year 1998–2004 2000–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Groupe Finot Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 10.14 m (33.3 ft) 10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.0 m² (538 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.40
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
34.07
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
0.80
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331
17.63
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 measures 10.14m (33.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hunter 356 is 0.68m longer than the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 50.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 34.1% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 331 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS