1980 CS 33 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1980 CS 33 1980 CS 33
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1980 CS 33 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer CS Yachts Westerly
Year 1980–1987 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada UK
Designer Ray Wall Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 49.1 m² (529 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 0.56m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS