1976 C&C 33 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33
VS
1977 Cal 33 1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1976 C&C 33 1977 Cal 33
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Cal
Year 1976–1982 1977–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada USA
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.0 m² (452 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 C&C 33
15.57
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 C&C 33
45.00
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 C&C 33
0.81
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 C&C 33
18.07
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 C&C 33 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1976 C&C 33 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1976 C&C 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 C&C 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 C&C 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 C&C 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS