1984 Moody 33 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1984 Moody 33 1984 Moody 33
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1984 Moody 33 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Moody C&C Yachts
Year 1984–1990 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK Canada
Designer Bill Dixon Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.40 m (4.6 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.0 m² (474 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 20 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 140 L (37.0 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Moody 33
14.90
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Moody 33
40.38
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Moody 33
0.75
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Moody 33
21.57
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Moody 33 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1984 Moody 33 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1984 Moody 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Moody 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Moody 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Moody 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS