1983 Sabre 28 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison
1983 Sabre 28
1972 Ericson 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1983 Sabre 28 | 1972 Ericson 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Ericson |
| Year | 1983–1990 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Roger Hewson | Bruce King |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 35.3 m² (380 ft²) | 39.0 m² (420 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.
In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 1.22m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1972 Ericson 32 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1972 Ericson 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.