1983 Sabre 28 vs Catalina 323 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 28 1983 Sabre 28
VS
Catalina 323 Catalina 323

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1983 Sabre 28 Catalina 323
General
Manufacturer Sabre Catalina
Year 1983–1990 2004–2009
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Roger Hewson Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 35.3 m² (380 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
Catalina 323
16.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
Catalina 323
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
Catalina 323
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
Catalina 323
18.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and Catalina 323 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Catalina 323 is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Catalina 323 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Catalina 323 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The Catalina 323 is 1.22m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The Catalina 323 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 323, with an SA/D of 16.51 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 323 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Catalina 323 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 38.1% for the Catalina 323, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Catalina 323 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 323 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 323 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS