1975 S2 9.2C vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

1975 S2 9.2C 1975 S2 9.2C
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 S2 9.2C 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
Manufacturer S2 Hallberg-Rassy
Year 1975–1982 1997–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Arthur Edmunds German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.7 m² (460 ft²) 53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 S2 9.2C
16.99
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 S2 9.2C
41.11
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 S2 9.2C
0.76
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 S2 9.2C
21.78
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 S2 9.2C and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 S2 9.2C is a 1970s design by S2 from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1975 S2 9.2C was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1975 S2 9.2C measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 1.21m longer than the 1975 S2 9.2C. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 S2 9.2C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 42.7 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1975 S2 9.2C has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 S2 9.2C offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1975 S2 9.2C and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 S2 9.2C provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 S2 9.2C is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 S2 9.2C has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS