1976 Newport 27 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1976 Newport 271976 Newport 27
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1976 Newport 271982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerCapital YachtsWesterly
Year1976–19841982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGary MullEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.1 m² (313 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 Newport 27
16.08
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 Newport 27
41.80
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 Newport 27
0.76
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 Newport 27
21.02
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 Newport 27 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 Newport 27 is a 1970s design by Capital Yachts from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1976 Newport 27 was penned by Gary Mull. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1976 Newport 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.27m longer than the 1976 Newport 27. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 Newport 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 29.1 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1976 Newport 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 Newport 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1976 Newport 27 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 Newport 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 Newport 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1976 Newport 27 · 1982 Westerly Konsort