1976 Newport 27 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1976 Newport 27 1976 Newport 27
VS
Catalina 28 Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1976 Newport 27 Catalina 28
General
Manufacturer Capital Yachts Catalina
Year 1976–1984 1998–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gary Mull Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL 6.71 m (22.0 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 2.59 m (8.5 ft) 2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 29.1 m² (313 ft²) 33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 Newport 27
16.08
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 Newport 27
41.80
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 Newport 27
0.76
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 Newport 27
21.02
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 Newport 27 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 Newport 27 is a 1970s design by Capital Yachts from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1976 Newport 27 was penned by Gary Mull. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1976 Newport 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The Catalina 28 is 0.46m longer than the 1976 Newport 27. The Catalina 28 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 Newport 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 29.1 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 Newport 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1976 Newport 27 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 Newport 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Newport 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS