1976 Newport 27 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1976 Newport 27 1976 Newport 27
VS
1972 Ranger 29 1972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1976 Newport 27 1972 Ranger 29
General
Manufacturer Capital Yachts Ranger
Year 1976–1984 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gary Mull Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 6.71 m (22.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 2.59 m (8.5 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 29.1 m² (313 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 Newport 27
16.08
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 Newport 27
41.80
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 Newport 27
0.76
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 Newport 27
21.02
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 Newport 27 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 Newport 27 is a 1970s design by Capital Yachts from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1976 Newport 27 was penned by Gary Mull. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1976 Newport 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ranger 29 is 0.61m longer than the 1976 Newport 27. The 1972 Ranger 29 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 Newport 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 29.1 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 Newport 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1976 Newport 27 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 Newport 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Newport 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS