1972 Ericson 32 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1972 Ericson 32 1972 Ericson 32
VS
1972 Ranger 29 1972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Ericson 32 1972 Ranger 29
General
Manufacturer Ericson Ranger
Year 1972–1978 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bruce King Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.0 m² (420 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Ericson 32
21.98
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Ericson 32 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s design by Ericson from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1972 Ericson 32 was penned by Bruce King. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1972 Ericson 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 0.91m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1972 Ericson 32 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Ericson 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Ericson 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Ericson 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS