1978 Pearson 30 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison
1978 Pearson 30
1972 Ericson 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1978 Pearson 30 | 1972 Ericson 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Ericson |
| Year | 1978–1983 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Shaw | Bruce King |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.47 m (24.5 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 39.3 m² (423 ft²) | 39.0 m² (420 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1978 Pearson 30 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.
In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 0.61m longer than the 1978 Pearson 30. The 1972 Ericson 32 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Pearson 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1978 Pearson 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.