1993 Najad 360 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison

1993 Najad 360 1993 Najad 360
VS
1972 Ericson 32 1972 Ericson 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1993 Najad 360 1972 Ericson 32
General
Manufacturer Najad Ericson
Year 1993–2002 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Bruce King
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.42 m (11.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 2,700 kg (5,952 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 55.0 m² (592 ft²) 39.0 m² (420 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 120 L (31.7 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Najad 360
16.04
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Najad 360
41.54
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Najad 360
0.73
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Najad 360
20.68
1972 Ericson 32
21.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Najad 360 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1993 Najad 360 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1993 Najad 360 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1993 Najad 360 is 1.22m longer than the 1972 Ericson 32. The 1993 Najad 360 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Najad 360 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1993 Najad 360 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Najad 360 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Najad 360 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1993 Najad 360 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS