1973 Cal 25 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1973 Cal 25 1973 Cal 25
VS
1972 Ranger 29 1972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1973 Cal 25 1972 Ranger 29
General
Manufacturer Cal Ranger
Year 1973–1978 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bill Lapworth Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 6.10 m (20.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 2.44 m (8.0 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 726 kg (1,601 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 26.5 m² (285 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 7 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 30 L (7.9 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1973 Cal 25
18.11
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1973 Cal 25
40.02
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1973 Cal 25
0.80
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1973 Cal 25
19.77
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1973 Cal 25 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1973 Cal 25 is a 1970s design by Cal from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1973 Cal 25 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1973 Cal 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ranger 29 is 1.22m longer than the 1973 Cal 25. The 1972 Ranger 29 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1973 Cal 25 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.11 and 26.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Cal 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1973 Cal 25 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1973 Cal 25 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1973 Cal 25 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Cal 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS