1994 Catalina 320 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 320 1994 Catalina 320
VS
1972 Ranger 29 1972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Catalina 320 1972 Ranger 29
General
Manufacturer Catalina Ranger
Year 1994–2007 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 133 L (35.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1994 Catalina 320 is 0.91m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1994 Catalina 320 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS