1994 Catalina 320 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 320 1994 Catalina 320
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40 1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Catalina 320 1987 Cape Dory 40
General
Manufacturer Catalina Cape Dory
Year 1994–2007 1987–1992
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 40 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 133 L (35.1 gal) 284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1994 Catalina 320. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 81% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS