1994 Catalina 320 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 320 1994 Catalina 320
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Catalina 320 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Catalina C&C Yachts
Year 1994–2007 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Canada
Designer Gerry Douglas Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 133 L (35.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1994 Catalina 320. The 1994 Catalina 320 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Catalina 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS