1994 Catalina 320 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

1994 Catalina 320 1994 Catalina 320
VS
1977 Cal 33 1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Catalina 320 1977 Cal 33
General
Manufacturer Catalina Cal
Year 1994–2007 1977–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 133 L (35.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Catalina 320
17.01
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Catalina 320
40.00
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Catalina 320
0.80
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Catalina 320
18.48
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1994 Catalina 320. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS