1994 J/105 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1994 J/105 1994 J/105
VS
1972 Ranger 29 1972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 J/105 1972 Ranger 29
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Ranger
Year 1994–2008 1972–1978
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL 8.97 m (29.4 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 57.6 m² (620 ft²) 35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 13 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1994 J/105 is 1.68m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1994 J/105 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS