1978 Albin Ballad 30 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1978 Albin Ballad 30 1978 Albin Ballad 30
VS
1983 Irwin 32 1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1978 Albin Ballad 30 1983 Irwin 32
General
Manufacturer Albin Irwin
Year 1978–1984 1983–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer Rolf Magnusson Ted Irwin
Dimensions
LOA 9.07 m (29.8 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 2.90 m (9.5 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.45 m (4.8 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,400 kg (7,496 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,450 kg (3,197 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.5 m² (414 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Albin Ballad 30
17.30
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Albin Ballad 30
42.65
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Albin Ballad 30
0.77
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Albin Ballad 30
20.56
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Albin Ballad 30 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Albin Ballad 30 is a 1970s design by Albin from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1978 Albin Ballad 30 was penned by Rolf Magnusson. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1978 Albin Ballad 30 measures 9.07m (29.8ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 0.68m longer than the 1978 Albin Ballad 30. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Albin Ballad 30 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 38.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Albin Ballad 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Albin Ballad 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.7% for the 1978 Albin Ballad 30 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Albin Ballad 30 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Albin Ballad 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS