1970 Bristol 32 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 32 1970 Bristol 32
VS
1983 Irwin 32 1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1970 Bristol 32 1983 Irwin 32
General
Manufacturer Bristol Irwin
Year 1970–1977 1983–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Ted Irwin
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.16 m (23.5 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.2 m² (433 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Bristol 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Bristol 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS