1996 Hunter 290 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1996 Hunter 290 1996 Hunter 290
VS
1983 Irwin 32 1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Hunter 290 1983 Irwin 32
General
Manufacturer Hunter Irwin
Year 1996–2000 1983–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Glenn Henderson Ted Irwin
Dimensions
LOA 8.84 m (29.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL 7.47 m (24.5 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,493 kg (7,701 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.9 m² (419 ft²) 41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 0.91m longer than the 1996 Hunter 290. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1996 Hunter 290 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Hunter 290 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS